Health Report
Trans People & H.I.V.
A brief summary of Camille Finks' report on the Transgender Community Health Project's (T.C.H.P.) study as
reported in F.T.M. Newsletter, Issue 45, Summer 1999,
F.T.M. International.
(The Gender Centre advise that this article may not be current and as such certain content, including
but not limited to persons, contact details and dates may not apply. Where legal authority or medical related matters are
cited, responsibility lies with the reader to obtain the most current relevant legal authority and/or medical
publication.)
Findings Summary
In February of this year (1999) at a community meeting in San Francisco's Tenderloin district, the Transgender Community Health Project
(T.C.H.P.) of the city's Public Health Department presented the findings of its groundbreaking study of
H.I.V. risk among M.T.F.
and F.T.M. transgendered individuals in the Bay Area. The
T.C.H.P. had also previously made a formal presentation of it's
findings to the Federal Centre for Disease Control in Atlanta.
A staff of transgendered interviewers spoke with 123 F.T.M. and 392
M.T.F. participants from July to December 1997. Socio-demographic information as well as
data regarding medical history and health status, H.I.V. prevention service
access, sexual behaviours, drug use behaviours and psychosocial factors were collected. Respondents were tested for
H.I.V. and received
H.I.V. /
S.T.D. counselling, harm reduction counselling and referrals. The study
specifically sought to "sample a large number of transgendered persons who typically are not eligible for studies or are excluded from
analysis because their gender does not fit the male/female dichotomy."
F.T.M. sample was 67% white, about 10% each Latino, African-American and Asian-Pacific
Islander and 3% Native American. M.T.F. sample was 27% each white, Latino, and
African-American and 13% Asian-Pacific Islander and 6% Native American. Both groups had a median age of around 35, with the
F.T.M. group having a higher median income, higher rates of private health insurance,
lower rates of past incarceration, and radically lower rates of H.I.V.
infection.
While 80% of the F.T.M.s had jobs, stable housing and at least some college education,
40% of the M.T.F.s were homeless or in unstable housing and more than half the
M.T.F.s interviewed had a high school education or less.
30-50% of both groups had high rates of S.T.D. diagnosis, and similar
numbers had had mental health conditions resulting in prescribed medication. About 30% of both groups reported suicide attempts.
Hormones / Surgery
Of F.T.M.s: over half reported hormone use with one-third undergoing sexual
reassignment or gender confirmation surgery and some 85% indicated they planned to have surgery.
Of M.T.F.s: 91% used hormones with 22% undergoing some type of surgery and 72% planned
to have surgery in the future.
Abuse / Discrimination
All F.T.M. respondents reported experiencing "some form of discrimination or abuse
related to gender presentation or gender identity".
M.T.F.s also reported similarly high incidences of discrimination and abuse, with 37%
experiencing recent physical abuse.
Sexual Practices
Among both F.T.M. and M.T.F.
respondents, 59% reported a history of forced sex or rape. The rates of unprotected sex amongst
F.T.M.s was 28% unsafe anal intercourse with 64% having unprotected vaginal
intercourse.
The rates of unprotected sex amongst M.T.F.s ranged between 64% - 85% for unprotected
anal sex with 6% engaging in unprotected vaginal intercourse.
The issue of low self-esteem and unprotected sex was significant for both F.T.M. and
M.T.F. participants.
Drugs and Alcohol
The study indicated that 23% of F.T.M.s had a history of participation in an alcohol
treatment program and one-fifth in a drug treatment program. About 18% of F.T.M.s surveyed
reported lifetime injection drug use - most commonly speed, heroin, and cocaine - and a very high number of these individuals shared
syringes (91%).
18% of M.T.F.s reported recent injecting drug use.
H.I.V. Rates
The study found an alarming H.I.V. prevalence among
M.T.F. participants with over two-thirds of this group testing positive for the
H.I.V. virus.
Participants of the qualitative study who were living with H.I.V. felt
that the transgender individuals need more client advocacy and case management, particularly in terms of health care.
Conclusions
Researchers commented that the reports of unprotected anal sex and needle sharing suggest that
F.T.M.s who have sex with men, and those who inject drugs may be at risk for
H.I.V. and should be targeted during outreach. For
M.T.F.s, the data indicate that histories of sex work, unprotected anal sex and injection
drug use together with a high level of recent risk behaviours "suggest continued transmission of
H.I.V. among M.T.F.
individuals and their sexual and drug using patterns."
Dion Manley and Jed Bell, writers for the F.T.M. Newsletter (Issue 45, Summer 1999),
state two concerns with the conclusions reached within the T.C.H.P.s
findings.
"(1) The class and race breakdowns of F.T.M.s differ so vastly from those of
M.T.F.s in the study, that we believe they cannot simply reflect an objective difference
in the two populations.
Instead, we believe this difference must also reflect the different ways available in the investigating staff for reaching
F.T.M.s and M.T.F.s. Both populations
were sought out in the street and community settings. But our speculation is that most
F.T.M.s were actually reached through organisations, meetings and community events, while
most M.T.F.s were contacted through street outreach and social service programs. While
this difference reflects real contrasts in our lives and in how M.T.F.s and
F.T.M.s can be contacted in this city, it may not reflect such vast differences in the
overall transgendered populations.
(2) Even without this issue and place, we neither understand nor agree with the
T.C.H.P.s conclusion that
F.T.M.s are at low risk for
H.I.V.. F.T.M.s frequently
engage in high-risk behaviours, according to the report (see "Sexual Practices" and
"H.I.V. /
AIDS: Some Issues for
F.T.M.s" by Ms. Vivianne K. Namaste,
Ph.D.).
Polare is published in Australia by The Gender Centre
Inc. which is funded by the Department of Community Services under the
S.A.A.P. Program and supported by the
N.S.W. Health Department through the
AIDS and Infectious Diseases Branch. Polare provides a
forum for discussion and debate on gender issues. Advertisers are advised that all advertising is their responsibility under
the Trade Practices Act. Unsolicited contributions are welcome, though no guarantee is made by the Editor that they will be
published, nor any discussion entered into. The editor reserves the right to edit such contributions without notification.
Any submission which appears in Polare may be published on our internet site. Opinions expressed in this publication do not
necessarily reflect those of the Editor, The Gender Centre Inc.I, the
Department of Community Services or the N.S.W. Department of Health.
|