Pesticides Cause Gender Change
by N.M. Lee
(The Gender Centre advise that this article may not be current and as such certain content, including
but not limited to persons, contact details and dates may not apply. Where legal authority or medical related matters are
cited, responsibility lies with the reader to obtain the most current relevant legal authority and/or medical
publication.)
There is now growing evidence that a range of pesticides, industrial compounds, and at least one
food additive are causing sex hormone changes in a range of animals from fish to turtles. Some scientists have argued that the effects of
these hormone-mimicking chemicals threaten the future of the planet. Whilst governments around the world are preoccupied with the toxic and
cancer causing effect of industrial chemicals, they seem to have overlooked the effects of these compounds on the environment at minute
concentrations.
Researchers around the world have discovered that wildlife exposed, even briefly, to these chemicals even at critical stages during
embryonic development have undergone sex-hormone changes and physical disorders. The result of chemical contamination has meant that there
are rivers that only produce female fish; male alligators were born with abnormally small genitals, turtle and bird populations have
developed weird reproductive problems, and frog populations around the world have diminished or vanished.
It has been assumed that embryonic development is controlled by genes, but hormones are the essential chemical messages around the body:
in effect switching genes on and off. Interruptions of these hormonal messages can have a devastating effect. An embryo has the potential
to develop wither male or female characteristics but exposure to hormone-mimicking chemicals may interrupt or alter the development of
normal sex organs.
It has been known for some time that sexual orientation/gender is determined during the development of an organism, in higher animals
(and humans) this occurs during embryonic development but in other, such as rats, this occurs shortly after birth. Researchers can change
the sexual orientation of rats by injecting female hormones into male rats resulting in the rats behaving as if they were female and vice
versa. In the 1950's researchers at Syracuse University (New York) shower that genetically male chickens exposed to
D.D.T. grew up and acted like hens.
There has been little research on the effects of chemicals on humans and extrapolating field studies on wildlife and laboratory
experiments to humans is controversial. Given that the hormones controlling development have stayed constant throughout vertebrate
evolution, the hormones controlling development of tadpoles into frogs are the same as which control human sexual development. Theo
Colborn, a researcher at University of Wisconsin, has raised the question that if these chemicals are causing a worldwide decline in frog
populations what effects are they having on humans? There has apparently been an increase in human diseases and congenital abnormalities
that could be linked to hormonal disruption.
What does this mean for the transgender community? The jury is still out as far as a direct cause and effect, but there is some
anecdotal evidence.
Theo Colborn, John Peterson Meyers and Dianne Dumanoski have written a book on their research titled
"Our Stolen Future"
Polare is published in Australia by The Gender Centre
Inc. which is funded by the Department of Community Services under the
S.A.A.P. Program and supported by the
N.S.W. Health Department through the
AIDS and Infectious Diseases Branch. Polare provides a
forum for discussion and debate on gender issues. Advertisers are advised that all advertising is their responsibility under
the Trade Practices Act. Unsolicited contributions are welcome, though no guarantee is made by the Editor that they will be
published, nor any discussion entered into. The editor reserves the right to edit such contributions without notification.
Any submission which appears in Polare may be published on our internet site. Opinions expressed in this publication do not
necessarily reflect those of the Editor, The Gender Centre Inc.I, the
Department of Community Services or the N.S.W. Department of Health.
|